It was only in the earlier part of 2010, particularly in May, that AMD decided to release a fresh new line of processors in order to fill in several of the discrepancies in their Phenom-II and Athlon-II Triple, Dual, and Quad Core Lines. Majority of the recently distributed processors are only 100MHz worth of increased clock speed with regards to the older processor versions.
The Athlon-II X2-260 possesses a clock speed of 3.2GHz, a massive 100MHz more as compared to the Athlon-II X2-255, which only had 3.1GHz. The latter Athlon version was actually only released sometime in January of 2010. Moreover, the newer Athlon version is actually regarded as a low end product, with regards to all of the recently released processors. In fact, it represents a market that is primarily value-based, as it can actually be purchased for only seventy-six dollars.
AMD’s Market Plan
AMD is presently spearheading within the low up to the mid-range world of computers. They have an ultimately firm and strong hold on the sub two hundred dollar market that seems to be expanding quite at a rapid speed. The lower end of the AMD processor line has largely developed from the X2, the dual core, only a year ago, to the X3, the triple core, as well as the X4, the quad core. The Athlon-II X4-620 actually presents a processing of the quad core of only under a hundred dollars.
They purposely built the Athlon-II line to be a much less costly alternative, despite the fact that they keep adding more and more features that AMD is certainly boasting. The associated chips have also been specifically designed without the necessary accompaniment of an L3 cache. In fact, it is this fact that is largely responsible for the low and more affordable price of the Athlon-II series of AMD.
Moreover, many of today’s technology enthusiasts even endure having to wait for an extremely long time just to be able to purchase a certain computer before even thinking of upgrading. This is in tune with the current trend in today’s computer gamers, since they prefer purchasing low end dual core processors of the Athlon-II line at 3.2 GHz. This amount leaves sufficient room for upgrades.
The predecessor the Athlon-II X2-260 is not totally different from the latter. In fact, they are actually more similar than they are different. The biggest difference that can be accounted for is the 100MHz differences in the clock speed.
With regards to the other features, the newer Athlon version was released to the market at a nearly similar price to the X2-255 version. The reason for this is because many of the processors worked by pushing down the corresponding prices of the older versions, making them a lot more affordable than they already are. Today, the difference that can be observed in the price circulates only at around ten dollars.
The decision is up to you, whether you would like to purchase the X2-260, which is ten dollars more than the X2-255. You can easily read the customer reviews in order to ascertain whether or not the ten dollars you spend is money well spent with the Athlon-II X2-260. Who knows? You might find that settling for AMD’s less expensive Athlon version works a lot better for you. You need to look at the processors as a whole, and not simply on the performance. You also have to figure out the over clocking ability in order to know the exact value of the recently released ADX260OCK23GQ.